MARK MOSSBITCOIN VALUATION LAB
09 / FAQ & GLOSSARY

Questions worth asking before trusting a number

Direct answers to the questions most likely to arise when the calculator is shared.

Is this a forecast or a thought experiment?

It is a conditional projection model. Historical evidence and selected relationships inform the future market path, while Bitcoin’s market share is explicitly assumed. A reader can use it to examine a thesis without treating the displayed price as the most likely outcome.

Calling it a scenario does not excuse incorrect numbers. It makes the assumptions that produce the numbers visible.

[MODEL]

Does Bitcoin have to take all of gold’s value?

No. Bitcoin can receive modeled contributions from several categories. In the finite-pie convention, a category may grow in dollar value while losing relative share. A total Bitcoin target alone does not determine which categories surrender that share.

Simple mode therefore compares Bitcoin with the rest of the pie, not with an invented residual gold figure. By-market mode calculates the residual gold implied by your chosen category inputs.

[MODEL]

Why not multiply Bitcoin by AI payment volume?

A payment is an activity over time. A savings balance is a stock at a time. The same balance can finance many transactions. Multiplying an activity forecast by an arbitrary factor would add a new model, not simply improve this one.

AI may matter if it changes sustained balances or allocations. V1 explains that possible channel but assigns no numerical AI premium.

[AI-BTC][AI-USDC][MODEL]

Is the basket bigger than net wealth?

It can be, because it counts real assets and several layers of financial claims. A bond, a loan and an equity claim can be different instruments without being independent underlying wealth. The $995.87T combined starting number is a modeled gross comparison, not a consolidated net-wealth census.

Broad credit is not added again on top of money, securities and the selected loan-form bucket. Remaining look-through overlap is disclosed rather than declared solved.

[MODEL][C06][C07]

Why is the baseline 2025 rather than today?

This is a frozen research release assembled from dated observations and estimates. A current Bitcoin quote would not make the rest of the global basket current. Mixing a live quote with stale market stocks would introduce a new date mismatch.

Future revisions can update the model as a dated version. The current app deliberately has no live API dependency.

[MODEL][BTC-REF]

A short glossary

TermMeaning in this lab
Store of valueAn asset or claim held partly to carry purchasing power into the future. A role, not a guarantee.
Gross inventorySum of the selected real assets and financial claims before comprehensive consolidation.
Broad moneyCurrency, deposits and other liquid components under the relevant statistical definitions.
Monetary deepeningChange in money relative to the economic-output measure used in the model.
Market shareA fraction of the specified modeled stock-value pie, not a fraction of users or transactions.
CaptureA chosen fraction attributed to Bitcoin within the finite-pie convention.
Nominal priceDollar value at the future date, not adjusted for consumer purchasing power.
CAGRConstant annual rate that connects two endpoints; it does not describe every intervening year.
Relative-share driftA modeled change in raw relative category weight before normalization.
SensitivityA controlled change to an input, not a measured probability interval.
T / QT = trillion dollars; Q = quadrillion dollars = 1,000T.

What belongs in version 2.0?

The deferred work is a behavioral adoption model: reachable capital, new adopters, retention, and allocation expansion. It could compare those mechanisms with Mark’s explicit whole-pie milestones, rather than replace them silently.

Version 1 is intentionally finished without that upgrade. No later model, source update or category migration is implied to be running in the background.

[MODEL][VC-AI]